نوع مقاله : علمی ـ پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استاد، سطوح عالی حوزه و دکترای فلسفه علوم اجتماعی (نویسنده مسئول).
2 دانشیار، گروه علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه باقرالعلوم ع
3 استادیار، گروه علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه باقرالعلوم ع
4 دانشیار، گروه فلسفه حقوق دانشگاه باقرالعلوم ع
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence), as one of the key religious sciences, holds significant potential for shaping religious sciences, particularly in its capacity to explain social phenomena, thereby positioning itself as a social science. It seems that the jurisprudential focus on masalih (benefits) and mafasid (harms), along with its attention to the consequences of rulings, enables a unique form of explanation within fiqh. However, a key question arises: What is the relationship between a fiqh-based explanation grounded in benefits and harms and Functional explanation? This study, employing a descriptive approach and analyzing data from both fiqh and social sciences, argues that reconciling these two explanatory models is not feasible. The differences are substantial, both in foundational principles and practical application. Functional approaches, rooted in positivist philosophy, exclude fiqh from the scope of science due to its reliance on revelation as a source of knowledge. Moreover, while fiqh embodies a critical and progressive nature, functionalist theories tend to adopt a conservative perspective toward society. Therefore, despite superficial similarities, the divergence between these two types of explanation is profound.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)