عنوان مقاله [English]
A brief look at the various commentary books reveals the undeniable fact that each of them has been formulated with a specific tendency, method and point of view, which has caused a significant distance and difference between these interpretations. In some cases, the interpretations of a verse seem to be contradictory and contradictory. The question is, what has caused such a difference of interpretation?
This paper, using one of the paradigms proposed in the discussion of "social determination of knowledge" and the use of credit theory, as well as the use of analytical-descriptive methods; Attempts to prove the hypothesis that differences in views on interpretation are influenced by social determinations. In other words, interpretive opinions and perceptions are influenced by the conditions, contexts and social realities of the commentator society. Therefore, while addressing theoretical issues, it has also stated cases and issues as evidence for the effectiveness of the interpretation of social determination