A Re-examination of Professor Motahari's Philosophical Viewpoint on Nationalism as a Component of Iranian Modernity

Document Type : The Quarterly Jornal

Author

Associate Professor, Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Modernity is one of the key concepts discussed by Professor Morteza Motahari. Of course, modernity has various aspects and in this study, we will focus on the collective issue or narrative of Iranian nationalism and Motahari's criticisms on it. Motahari does not narrate the concept of Iranianness in the form of "Aryan race" and says that the conceptualization of Iranianness in the form of Aryanism alienates the majority of the Iranian nation and this alienation is against the real national interests of Iran. Why does Motahari say this? What is Motahari's basis for this conceptualization? Does he not pay attention to the fact that his words are against the discourse of extreme nationalism? Does he not think about Iranian nationality? What are the Motahari's reasons who is a first class philosopher? Professor Motahari's answer is very surprising. It is true that he is not an anthropologist in the academic sense of the word. However, his answer is derived from a deep anthropology and his experimental understanding of Iran's pluralistic society, which is rooted in his philosophical worldview and this worldview, formulates the problem of society under historical developments and sees the relationship between religion and society as heavily involved in the construction of national affairs and national identity. The research method in this article is based on critical content analysis method.

Keywords

References

1.    Connor, S. (1987). Postmodern Culture: An introduction to Theories of the Contemporary, Oxford: Blackwell.
2.    Gellner, E. (2005). Nations and Nationalism (2nd Ed.), Blackwell.
3.    Head, Brian. (1985). Ideology and Social Science: Destutt de Tracy and French Liberalism. Publisher: Nijhoff.
4.    Kennedy, E. (1979). Ideology from Destut De Tracy to Marx. Journal of the History of Ideas, 40(3), pp. 353-368.
5.    Mannheim, K. (1936). Ideology and Utopia. London: Routledge,
6.    Meskoub, Sh. (1394 AP). Iranian identity and Persian language. Tehran: Farzan Rouz Publications. [In Persian]
7.    Miri, S. J. (1398 AP). Iran in five narratives. Tehran: Naqd Farhang Publications. [In Persian]
8.    Miri, S. J. (1398 AP). Language and the idea of national unity: rereading the discourse of archaic nationalism. Tehran: Naqd Farhang Publications. [In Persian]
9.    Motahari, M. (1394 AP). The future of Iran's Islamic revolution. Qom: Sadra Publications. [In Persian]
10.    Motahari, M. (1396 AP). Mutual services of Islam and Iran. Qom: Sadra Publications. [In Persian]
11.    Smith, A. (2010). Nationalism: Theory, Ideology, History, Polity.
12.    Soroush, A. (1384 AP). The story of the master of knowledge. Qom: Serat Cultural Institute. [In Persian]
Journal of Islam and Social Studies
Volume 10, Issue 39 - Serial Number 39
ExecutiveExpert
January 2023
Pages 171-196

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 07 July 2021
  • Revise Date: 08 November 2021
  • Accept Date: 24 November 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics