The Rationality of Social Action, from the Perspective of Islamic Wisdom in the Face of the Weberian Tradition

Document Type : The Quarterly Jornal

Authors

1 Assistant professor, department of social sciences, Baqir al-Olum University

2 PhD student in philosophy of social sciences, Baqir al-Olum University

Abstract

Rationality is one of the struggling issues for thinkers of social sciences. Among them, Max Weber has formulated the rationality of social action based on a particular concept of reason and action, and has considered modern societies as rational, which is incompatible with the view of Islamic scholars. Accordingly, the rationality of social action, from viewpoint of Islamic wisdom, has been examined and explained through using an analytic-comparative approach to the Weberian tradition.
Rationality and action are the terms that, in the abstract sense, they mean "derived from reason and will", but in concrete sense, they have their own special meanings based on how they view the nature and cognitive faculty and motive power of human. Accordingly, in Webber's analysis, reason and action have been considered the method and practice derived from the autonomous practical wisdom and the rationality of social action, as well as having a mathematical calculation to achieve the aims of life, reductionism, and Western society, a rational society, and at the same time suffering from the crisis of spirituality.
However, Islamic scholars, based on their view of human nature and power, regard "reason" as the capacity for the understanding of meanings, and "action" as the result of the will arising from the stimulative power influenced by the powers and dispositions of high and wicked human's selves. Therefore, they define the rationality of social action, as social actions based on the capacity of perceiving abstract meanings, and in its various contexts and examples, they consider the definition and observance of the method as well as rational calculation in social action as only one of the criteria for being rational, and in this respect, they don't let the society suffer from a crisis of spirituality.
Rationality is one of the struggling issues for thinkers of social sciences. Among them, Max Weber has formulated the rationality of social action based on a particular concept of reason and action, and has considered modern societies as rational, which is incompatible with the view of Islamic scholars. Accordingly, the rationality of social action, from viewpoint of Islamic wisdom, has been examined and explained through using an analytic-comparative approach to the Weberian tradition.
Rationality and action are the terms that, in the abstract sense, they mean "derived from reason and will", but in concrete sense, they have their own special meanings based on how they view the nature and cognitive faculty and motive power of human. Accordingly, in Webber's analysis, reason and action have been considered the method and practice derived from the autonomous practical wisdom and the rationality of social action, as well as having a mathematical calculation to achieve the aims of life, reductionism, and Western society, a rational society, and at the same time suffering from the crisis of spirituality.
However, Islamic scholars, based on their view of human nature and power, regard "reason" as the capacity for the understanding of meanings, and "action" as the result of the will arising from the stimulative power influenced by the powers and dispositions of high and wicked human's selves. Therefore, they define the rationality of social action, as social actions based on the capacity of perceiving abstract meanings, and in its various contexts and examples, they consider the definition and observance of the method as well as rational calculation in social action as only one of the criteria for being rational, and in this respect, they don't let the society suffer from a crisis of spirituality.

Keywords

References

1. Aron, Raymond (1387 SH), Main Currents in Sociological Thought, translated by Baqir Parham, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications.
2. Azad Armaki, Taqi (1375 SH), The Sociology of Rationality, Qom: Quarterly Journal of Qabasat, vol.1, issue
3. Ibn Arabi, Mohyi al-Din Mohammad Ibn Ali (1336 AH), Al-Tadbirat fi Islah al-Mamlekah al-Insaniyah, al-Bab al-Sabi'e: fi Zikr al-Vazir Va Sefatehi Va Kayf Yajeb Ayn Yakun. p.344, retrieved from the pdf at www.pdffactory.com.
4. Avicenna, Abu Ali Hossain Ibn Abdollah (1362 SH), Tabi'eiat Shifa, vol.2, studied and introduced by Ibrahim Madkur, Qom: The Library of Ayatollah Mar'ashi Najafi.
5. Ibn Faris, Ahmad (1404 AH), Mo'jam Maqa'is al-Loqah, vol.4, by Abdosalam Mohammad Haroon, Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
6. Ibn Manzur, Mohammad Ibn Mokaram (1414 AH), Lisan al-Arab, vol.11, Beirut: Dar Sader.
7. Turner, Stephen et.al (1394 SH), Rationality (a collection of articles in Philosophical and literature Quarterly Journal of Arqanoon 15, Tehran: Institute for Publications and Publishing.
8. Eslami Tanha, Asghar (1390 SH), The opposite reflection of rationality in the cultural theory of Max Weber and Allameh Tabataba'ei, Journal of Ma'arefat Farhangi Ijtimaei, second year, issue 2.
9. Parsania, Hamid (1391 SH), The critical methodology of Sadraei wisdom, Qom: Kitab Farda Publications.
10. (1391 SH), Social Worlds, Qom: Kitab Farda Publications.
11. Benton, Ted & Ian Craib (1384 SH), Philosophy of Social Scinces, philosophical foundations of social thought, translated by Mosami parast and Mahmud Motahed, Tehran: Agah Publications.
12. Ibn Ahmad, Khalil (1424 AH), Kitab al-Ain, vol.3, Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-Ilmiyyah.
13. Talebzadeh, Hamid and Morteza Rohani (1390 SH), Anthropology in Kant's Thought, Journal of Metaphisics, issues 11 &12.
14. Bendix, Reinhard (1396 SH), Max Weber's intellectual viewpoints, translated by Mahmud Rambod, Tehran: Hermes Publications.
15. Shaiati, Ali, a collection of works 12 (history of civilization 2), Dr. Shariati Cultural Foundation.
16. Sadeghi, Hadi (1386 SH), Rationality of Faith, Qom: Kitab Taha.
17. Sadrodin Shirazi, Mohammad Ibn Ibrahim (1981), al-Hikmah al-Mota'aliah fi al-Asfar al-Aqliyyah al-Arba'ah, annotated by Allameh Tabatabai, vols 2, 7, 8, Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Toras al-Arabi.
18. Tabatabaei, Sayyid Mohammad Hossein (1390 SH), Translation of Tafsir al-Mizan, vol.2, (20 vols), translated by Sayyid Mohammad Baqir Musavi Hamedani, Qom: Islamic Publications Office.
19. Al-Farabi, Abi Nasr (1413 AH), al-'amal al-Falsafiah, Beirut: Dar al-Manahil.
20. (1405 AH), Fosul Montaza'eh, Tehran: Maktab al-Zahra.
21. (1975), Tahsil al-Sa'adah, by Jafar Aleyasin.
22. Freund, Julien (1383 SH), Max Weber Sociology, translated by Abdolhossain Nik Gohar, Tehran: Tutia Publications.
23. Qa'eminia, Alireza (1383 SH), The nature of rationality, Journal of Zehn(mind), no.17.
24. Kant, Immanuel, an examination of pure reason, translated by Mir Shamsodin Adib Soltani, Tehran: Amir Kabir.
25. (1384 SH), Lessons of philosophy of ethics, translated by Manuchehr Sane'ei, Tehran: Naqsh va Negar.
26. (1394 SH), a critique of sheer intellect, translated by Behruz Nazari, Tehran: Qoqnus Publications.
27. Kerben, Henry (1393 SH), The history of Islamic philosophy, translated by Sayyid Asadollah Mobasheri, Tehran: The Institute for Amir Kabir Publications.
28. Madadpour, (1375 SH), The nature of rationality, Journal of Qabasat, vol.1, issue 1.
29. Malekian, Mostafa (1379 SH), consultation of religion and rationality, Journal of Naqd va Nazar, no. 25&26.
30. Weber, Max (1395 SH), The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, translated by Abdolkarim Rashidian and Parisa Manuchehri, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications.
31. (1395 SH), The methodology of social sciences, translated by Hassan Chavoshian, Tehran: Markaz Publications.
32. (1395 SH), The basic concepts of sociology, translated by Ahamd Sedarati, Tehran: Markaz Publications.
33. (1390 SH), Scientist and Politician, translated by Dr. Ahmad Naqibzadeh, Tehran: Elmi Publications.
34. Auguste Comte (1875), System of Positive Polity, Fiest Volume. London Longmans, Geeen, And Co.
35. Foley, R. (1988): “Some Different Conceptions of Rationality” in McMillin (ed), Constraction.and Constraint, University of Notre Dame Press.
36. Russell, B. (1956), Human Society in Ethics and Politics, Allen and Unwin.
37. Weber, M. (1968), Basic Sociological Terms. Economy and Society. G. Roth and C. Wittich. Berkeley, University of California Press. 3-62.
38. Webster ,Merriam (1966), webster's Third NewInternational Dictionary of the English Language Unabrridge, chicago: Encydopedia Britanica.
 
 
Journal of Islam and Social Studies
Volume 7, Issue 25 - Serial Number 25
ExecutiveExpert
October 2019
Pages 7-28

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 13 November 2018
  • Revise Date: 13 October 2019
  • Accept Date: 10 March 2019

Share

How to cite

Statistics