Comparison of Mulla Sadra and Roy Bhaskar Ontology: With the Emphasis on the Role of the Concept of ‘Unseen’

Document Type : The Quarterly Jornal

Authors

1 bagherololum Univercity

2 PhD Student of Philosophy of Social Sciences, Baqir al-Olum University (Corresponding Author)

Abstract

Critical realism is a relatively novel approach that has two important claims: first, the outer world exists independently of us, and secondly, knowledge of this world, as it is, is possible. Roy Bhaskar, who is the most prominent thinker of this approach, appreciates a great contribution for ontology in his theorizing. His first question is how the world should be so that our knowledge of it becomes possible? The answer to this question depicts a layered ontology in front of the eyes, which includes three levels of empirical, actual, and real. In addition to his view of the existence of necessity and causal mechanisms, as well as introducing the concept of the unclean in his dialectical theory, this ontology reveals similarities between his ontology and the ontology of Mulla Sadra based on the originality of existence, and this question arises in the mind as to which differences exist between these two ontologies.
Utilizing a descriptive-analytic method, this paper draws a comparison between the ontology of these two thinkers and shows that although Bhaskar, in his layered ontology, has been exceeded perceptible things by his belief in the existence of necessities and causal mechanisms, his ontology is in the material layer in the system of Sadraian thought. And he does not believe in an immaterial thing, and although it is close in meaning, the notion of unseen is different in the ontology of each of these two thinkers.

Keywords


  1. Afrough, Emad. (2015). Sharhi bar Dialectic-i Roy Bhaskar. Tehran: Nashr-i Elm.
  2. Ashtiyani, Jalal al-Din. (2001). Sharh-i hal va ara-yi falsafi-i Mulla Sadra. Qum: Markaz-i Intisharat-i Daftar-i Tablighat-i Islami-i Hawzah-i `Ilmiyah-i Qum.
  3. Bahaskar, Roy, & Norrie, Alan W. (1998). Introduction: Dialectic and dialectical critical realism. In Margaret Scotford Archer (Ed.), Critical realism : essential readings (pp. 561-574). London ; New York: Routledge.
  4. Bahaskar, Roy. (1975). Forms of realism. Philosophica, 15(1), 99-127.
  5. Benton, Ted, & Craib, Ian. (2010). Philosophy of social science : the philosophical foundations of social thought (Shahnaz Mosammaparast & Mahmoud Motahed, Trans.). Tehran: Nashr-i Agah.
  6. Bhaskar, Roy. (1993). Dialectic : the pulse of freedom. London: Verso.
  7. Bhaskar, Roy. (2008). A realist theory of science. London ; New York: Verso.
  8. Callinicos, Alex. (2017). Roy Bhaskar’s Dialectic: Critical Realism and Beyond.   Retrieved from http://tajrishcircle.org/رئالیسم-انتقادی-فراسویش-دیالکتیک-روی/#_ftn1
  9. Collier, Andrew. (1998). The power of negative thinking. In Margaret Scotford Archer (Ed.), Critical realism : essential readings (pp. 688-694). London ; New York: Routledge.
  10. Fleetwood, Steve. (2014). Bhaskar and Critical Realism. In Paul S. Adler, Paul Du Gay, Glenn Morgan, & M. I. Reed (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of sociology, social theory, and organization studies : contemporary currents (First edition. ed., pp. 182-219). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  11. Mohammadpour, Ahmad. Ravesh dar Ravesh. Tehran: Nashr-I Jameshenasan.
  12. Norrie, Alan W. (2015). Dialectic and difference : dialectical critical realism and the grounds of justice (Emad Afrough, Trans.). Tehran: Nashr-i Elm.
  13. Tabatabai, Muhammad Husayn. (2007). Nihayat al-Hikmat. Qum: Moasisat al-Nashr al-Islami.
  14. Tohidinasab, Zeynab, & Forouzandeh, Marziyeh. (2013). Realism-i Enteghadi, Hastishenasi Ejtemaei va Emkan-i Varesi Tajrobi dar Padideha-yi Ejtemaei. Qum: Boustan-i Ketab.